Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo

Jesús Alfonso Soto Pineda, Luis Felipe Jaramillo de los Ríos

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículo

Resumen

On the understanding that Harvard and Chicago Schools postulates, this paper conducts a comparative analysis between those and the conceptual pillars of the Neo-institutional School. Within the framework of traditional disputes between Chicago and Harvard Schools, the advances of neoinstitutionalism, might explain how both Schools support different purposes for competition law, but rely on the same origins, since the two of them were created to fight harmful excess of market power and corporate mergers. It is in that context, the neoinstitutionalism explains how processes of market power and concentration can emerge, going beyond what traditional perspectives have considered about them.

Idioma originalEspañol
Páginas (desde-hasta)77-106
Número de páginas30
PublicaciónBoletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado
Volumen51
N.º154
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 1 ene 2019

Huella dactilar

neoinstitutionalism
market power
school
merger
Law

Palabras clave

  • Antitrust
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • Neoin-stitutional school

Citar esto

@article{844d7deed80f49eb9e7b75429e04abb4,
title = "Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo",
abstract = "On the understanding that Harvard and Chicago Schools postulates, this paper conducts a comparative analysis between those and the conceptual pillars of the Neo-institutional School. Within the framework of traditional disputes between Chicago and Harvard Schools, the advances of neoinstitutionalism, might explain how both Schools support different purposes for competition law, but rely on the same origins, since the two of them were created to fight harmful excess of market power and corporate mergers. It is in that context, the neoinstitutionalism explains how processes of market power and concentration can emerge, going beyond what traditional perspectives have considered about them.",
keywords = "Antitrust, Chicago, Harvard, Neoin-stitutional school",
author = "Pineda, {Jes{\'u}s Alfonso Soto} and {de los R{\'i}os}, {Luis Felipe Jaramillo}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.22201/iij.24484873e.2019.154.14138",
language = "Espa{\~n}ol",
volume = "51",
pages = "77--106",
journal = "Boletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado",
issn = "0041-8633",
number = "154",

}

Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia : El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo. / Pineda, Jesús Alfonso Soto; de los Ríos, Luis Felipe Jaramillo.

En: Boletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado, Vol. 51, N.º 154, 01.01.2019, p. 77-106.

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículo

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia

T2 - El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo

AU - Pineda, Jesús Alfonso Soto

AU - de los Ríos, Luis Felipe Jaramillo

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - On the understanding that Harvard and Chicago Schools postulates, this paper conducts a comparative analysis between those and the conceptual pillars of the Neo-institutional School. Within the framework of traditional disputes between Chicago and Harvard Schools, the advances of neoinstitutionalism, might explain how both Schools support different purposes for competition law, but rely on the same origins, since the two of them were created to fight harmful excess of market power and corporate mergers. It is in that context, the neoinstitutionalism explains how processes of market power and concentration can emerge, going beyond what traditional perspectives have considered about them.

AB - On the understanding that Harvard and Chicago Schools postulates, this paper conducts a comparative analysis between those and the conceptual pillars of the Neo-institutional School. Within the framework of traditional disputes between Chicago and Harvard Schools, the advances of neoinstitutionalism, might explain how both Schools support different purposes for competition law, but rely on the same origins, since the two of them were created to fight harmful excess of market power and corporate mergers. It is in that context, the neoinstitutionalism explains how processes of market power and concentration can emerge, going beyond what traditional perspectives have considered about them.

KW - Antitrust

KW - Chicago

KW - Harvard

KW - Neoin-stitutional school

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075888414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.22201/iij.24484873e.2019.154.14138

DO - 10.22201/iij.24484873e.2019.154.14138

M3 - Artículo

AN - SCOPUS:85075888414

VL - 51

SP - 77

EP - 106

JO - Boletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado

JF - Boletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado

SN - 0041-8633

IS - 154

ER -