Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo

Jesús Alfonso Soto Pineda, Luis Felipe Jaramillo de los Ríos

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículo

Resumen

On the understanding that Harvard and Chicago Schools postulates, this paper conducts a comparative analysis between those and the conceptual pillars of the Neo-institutional School. Within the framework of traditional disputes between Chicago and Harvard Schools, the advances of neoinstitutionalism, might explain how both Schools support different purposes for competition law, but rely on the same origins, since the two of them were created to fight harmful excess of market power and corporate mergers. It is in that context, the neoinstitutionalism explains how processes of market power and concentration can emerge, going beyond what traditional perspectives have considered about them.

Título traducido de la contribuciónCommon aspects of the Chicago and Harvard schools of antitrust analysis: The neo-institutional contribution
Idioma originalEspañol
Páginas (desde-hasta)77-106
Número de páginas30
PublicaciónBoletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado
Volumen51
N.º154
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 1 ene 2019

Palabras clave

  • Antitrust
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • Neoin-stitutional school

Huella Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia: El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

  • Citar esto