Resumen
On the understanding that Harvard and Chicago Schools postulates, this paper conducts a comparative analysis between those and the conceptual pillars of the Neo-institutional School. Within the framework of traditional disputes between Chicago and Harvard Schools, the advances of neoinstitutionalism, might explain how both Schools support different purposes for competition law, but rely on the same origins, since the two of them were created to fight harmful excess of market power and corporate mergers. It is in that context, the neoinstitutionalism explains how processes of market power and concentration can emerge, going beyond what traditional perspectives have considered about them.
| Idioma original | Español |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 77-106 |
| Número de páginas | 30 |
| Publicación | Boletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado |
| Volumen | 51 |
| N.º | 154 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - 1 ene 2019 |
Huella dactilar
Palabras clave
- Antitrust
- Chicago
- Harvard
- Neoin-stitutional school
Citar esto
}
Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia : El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo. / Pineda, Jesús Alfonso Soto; de los Ríos, Luis Felipe Jaramillo.
En: Boletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado, Vol. 51, N.º 154, 01.01.2019, p. 77-106.Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revista › Artículo
TY - JOUR
T1 - Aspectos comunes de las escuelas de Chicago y Harvard en materia de libre competencia
T2 - El aporte del neoinstitucionalismo
AU - Pineda, Jesús Alfonso Soto
AU - de los Ríos, Luis Felipe Jaramillo
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - On the understanding that Harvard and Chicago Schools postulates, this paper conducts a comparative analysis between those and the conceptual pillars of the Neo-institutional School. Within the framework of traditional disputes between Chicago and Harvard Schools, the advances of neoinstitutionalism, might explain how both Schools support different purposes for competition law, but rely on the same origins, since the two of them were created to fight harmful excess of market power and corporate mergers. It is in that context, the neoinstitutionalism explains how processes of market power and concentration can emerge, going beyond what traditional perspectives have considered about them.
AB - On the understanding that Harvard and Chicago Schools postulates, this paper conducts a comparative analysis between those and the conceptual pillars of the Neo-institutional School. Within the framework of traditional disputes between Chicago and Harvard Schools, the advances of neoinstitutionalism, might explain how both Schools support different purposes for competition law, but rely on the same origins, since the two of them were created to fight harmful excess of market power and corporate mergers. It is in that context, the neoinstitutionalism explains how processes of market power and concentration can emerge, going beyond what traditional perspectives have considered about them.
KW - Antitrust
KW - Chicago
KW - Harvard
KW - Neoin-stitutional school
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075888414&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.22201/iij.24484873e.2019.154.14138
DO - 10.22201/iij.24484873e.2019.154.14138
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85075888414
VL - 51
SP - 77
EP - 106
JO - Boletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado
JF - Boletin Mexicano de Derecho Comparado
SN - 0041-8633
IS - 154
ER -