TY - JOUR
T1 - Insights from corporate social innovation
T2 - a research agenda
AU - Tabares, Sabrina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2020/8/19
Y1 - 2020/8/19
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyse the contributions, major discussions and trends in the literature driving the research agenda in corporate social innovation (CSI). This is done through a systematic review on CSI publications in an open time span. Salient themes and emerging research topics in this literature, as well as research questions and limitations, are identified, culminating in a discussion of what is next for CSI research. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic review was undertaken from academic and grey literature. Results were analysed following a bibliometric and interpretative content analysis. Findings: The study provides novel insights on CSI research by drawing attention to discussions around the consensus on a definition of CSI, its disciplinary origins and the denominations referring to this field. Although CSI struggles to gain independence as a research field, the evidence shows that CSI is a cross-disciplinary concept nourished by multiple disciplines. Research limitations/implications: Analysis in this paper has implications for research by highlighting the state of scholarship on CSI. Given the use of multiple denominations of CSI, several studies using low diffused denominations could be discarded. Originality/value: This research contributes to the body of knowledge in the field of CSI by bringing clarity to former discussions and by suggesting how the field can move forward to a more advanced and mature state in research.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyse the contributions, major discussions and trends in the literature driving the research agenda in corporate social innovation (CSI). This is done through a systematic review on CSI publications in an open time span. Salient themes and emerging research topics in this literature, as well as research questions and limitations, are identified, culminating in a discussion of what is next for CSI research. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic review was undertaken from academic and grey literature. Results were analysed following a bibliometric and interpretative content analysis. Findings: The study provides novel insights on CSI research by drawing attention to discussions around the consensus on a definition of CSI, its disciplinary origins and the denominations referring to this field. Although CSI struggles to gain independence as a research field, the evidence shows that CSI is a cross-disciplinary concept nourished by multiple disciplines. Research limitations/implications: Analysis in this paper has implications for research by highlighting the state of scholarship on CSI. Given the use of multiple denominations of CSI, several studies using low diffused denominations could be discarded. Originality/value: This research contributes to the body of knowledge in the field of CSI by bringing clarity to former discussions and by suggesting how the field can move forward to a more advanced and mature state in research.
KW - Capabilities
KW - Corporate social innovation (CSI)
KW - CSR
KW - Research themes
KW - Review
KW - SMEs
KW - Social innovation (SI)
KW - Sustainable development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087143870&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/SEJ-08-2019-0057
DO - 10.1108/SEJ-08-2019-0057
M3 - Artículo de revisión
AN - SCOPUS:85087143870
SN - 1750-8614
VL - 16
SP - 317
EP - 338
JO - Social Enterprise Journal
JF - Social Enterprise Journal
IS - 3
ER -