Resumen
This article is based on the recognition of the need for the work of a memory center or a truth commission to analyze the political challenge that this entails, bearing in mind that the institutional circumstances that condition the production of a final report turn its exercise of memory into a hegemonic narrative, while it is expected to contribute to the construction of the symbolic framework of post-conflict. The text presents arguments to show that the existence of victims not integrated in the institutional narrative opens the possibility of a politics of memory, as a task that must be incurred by society, that assumes the challenges left by the work of a truth commission. The text concludes that it is a citizen’s task to open the space for the political action of those victims not included in the regime of memory produced institutionally.
| Idioma original | Español |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 3-19 |
| Número de páginas | 17 |
| Publicación | Analisis Politico |
| Volumen | 31 |
| N.º | 93 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - 1 may 2018 |
Huella dactilar
Palabras clave
- Memory regime
- Open story
- Symbolic order
- Truth commission
- Victims
Citar esto
}
La memoria como relato abierto. Retos políticos del trabajo de los centros de memoria y las comisiones de verdad. / Zapata, Daniel Castaño; Castaño, Pedro Jurado; Romero, Gabriel Ruiz.
En: Analisis Politico, Vol. 31, N.º 93, 01.05.2018, p. 3-19.Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revista › Artículo › Investigación › revisión exhaustiva
TY - JOUR
T1 - La memoria como relato abierto. Retos políticos del trabajo de los centros de memoria y las comisiones de verdad
AU - Zapata, Daniel Castaño
AU - Castaño, Pedro Jurado
AU - Romero, Gabriel Ruiz
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - This article is based on the recognition of the need for the work of a memory center or a truth commission to analyze the political challenge that this entails, bearing in mind that the institutional circumstances that condition the production of a final report turn its exercise of memory into a hegemonic narrative, while it is expected to contribute to the construction of the symbolic framework of post-conflict. The text presents arguments to show that the existence of victims not integrated in the institutional narrative opens the possibility of a politics of memory, as a task that must be incurred by society, that assumes the challenges left by the work of a truth commission. The text concludes that it is a citizen’s task to open the space for the political action of those victims not included in the regime of memory produced institutionally.
AB - This article is based on the recognition of the need for the work of a memory center or a truth commission to analyze the political challenge that this entails, bearing in mind that the institutional circumstances that condition the production of a final report turn its exercise of memory into a hegemonic narrative, while it is expected to contribute to the construction of the symbolic framework of post-conflict. The text presents arguments to show that the existence of victims not integrated in the institutional narrative opens the possibility of a politics of memory, as a task that must be incurred by society, that assumes the challenges left by the work of a truth commission. The text concludes that it is a citizen’s task to open the space for the political action of those victims not included in the regime of memory produced institutionally.
KW - Memory regime
KW - Open story
KW - Symbolic order
KW - Truth commission
KW - Victims
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055653437&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15446/anpol.v31n93.75614
DO - 10.15446/anpol.v31n93.75614
M3 - Artículo
VL - 31
SP - 3
EP - 19
JO - Analisis Politico
JF - Analisis Politico
SN - 0121-4705
IS - 93
ER -