Orden de condena de perjuicios en abstracto en la acción de tutela: Subreglas en su inaplicación en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional

Diego Armando Yáñez Meza, Liliana Damaris Pabón Giraldo, Jennifer Patricia Santos Ibarra

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículoInvestigaciónrevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

The wide scope of the action of protection decisions in Colombia has allowed in innumerable cases, and not only in the text of sentence, the realization of rights in the lives of people, by granting diverse benefits, whether individuals or those who have administrative function. Amongst this typology of orders, we have Sentences for abstract payment for damages, which, although it is enshrined in the statutory decree that regulates this subject, has been little used by the judges and the Constitutional Court. In this respect and in the case of a typology with economic consequences for the defendant, and taking into account the Colombian context where there is a systematic threat and violation of fundamental rights, this research seeks to establish the sub-rules discovered from the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court and that motivates the reduced application of this order in the action of protection. The foregoing, because in the case of the protection of fundamental rights, the Sentence for abstract payment for damages extends its scope of protection, to the point of becoming the most powerful order of the judge of constitutional guardianship.

Título traducido de la contribuciónSentence for abstract payment for damages through the action of protection: Sub-rules in their non-application according to the Constitutional Court jurisprudence
IdiomaEspañol
Páginas339-370
Número de páginas32
PublicaciónRevista Derecho del Estado
Número de edición42
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 1 ene 2019

Huella dactilar

constitutional court
fundamental right
jurisprudence
typology
damages
guardianship
statutary order
Colombia
threat
economics

Palabras clave

  • Abstract payment for damages
  • Action of protection
  • Damages
  • Jurisprudential line
  • Reparation
  • Requirements
  • Subrules

Citar esto

@article{770485b2d5914de9af8e104f91a87319,
title = "Orden de condena de perjuicios en abstracto en la acci{\'o}n de tutela: Subreglas en su inaplicaci{\'o}n en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional",
abstract = "The wide scope of the action of protection decisions in Colombia has allowed in innumerable cases, and not only in the text of sentence, the realization of rights in the lives of people, by granting diverse benefits, whether individuals or those who have administrative function. Amongst this typology of orders, we have Sentences for abstract payment for damages, which, although it is enshrined in the statutory decree that regulates this subject, has been little used by the judges and the Constitutional Court. In this respect and in the case of a typology with economic consequences for the defendant, and taking into account the Colombian context where there is a systematic threat and violation of fundamental rights, this research seeks to establish the sub-rules discovered from the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court and that motivates the reduced application of this order in the action of protection. The foregoing, because in the case of the protection of fundamental rights, the Sentence for abstract payment for damages extends its scope of protection, to the point of becoming the most powerful order of the judge of constitutional guardianship.",
keywords = "Abstract payment for damages, Action of protection, Damages, Jurisprudential line, Reparation, Requirements, Subrules",
author = "Meza, {Diego Armando Y{\'a}{\~n}ez} and Giraldo, {Liliana Damaris Pab{\'o}n} and Ibarra, {Jennifer Patricia Santos}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.18601/01229893.n42.12",
language = "Espa{\~n}ol",
pages = "339--370",
journal = "Revista Derecho del Estado",
issn = "0122-9893",
number = "42",

}

Orden de condena de perjuicios en abstracto en la acción de tutela : Subreglas en su inaplicación en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional. / Meza, Diego Armando Yáñez; Giraldo, Liliana Damaris Pabón; Ibarra, Jennifer Patricia Santos.

En: Revista Derecho del Estado, N.º 42, 01.01.2019, p. 339-370.

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículoInvestigaciónrevisión exhaustiva

TY - JOUR

T1 - Orden de condena de perjuicios en abstracto en la acción de tutela

T2 - Revista Derecho del Estado

AU - Meza, Diego Armando Yáñez

AU - Giraldo, Liliana Damaris Pabón

AU - Ibarra, Jennifer Patricia Santos

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The wide scope of the action of protection decisions in Colombia has allowed in innumerable cases, and not only in the text of sentence, the realization of rights in the lives of people, by granting diverse benefits, whether individuals or those who have administrative function. Amongst this typology of orders, we have Sentences for abstract payment for damages, which, although it is enshrined in the statutory decree that regulates this subject, has been little used by the judges and the Constitutional Court. In this respect and in the case of a typology with economic consequences for the defendant, and taking into account the Colombian context where there is a systematic threat and violation of fundamental rights, this research seeks to establish the sub-rules discovered from the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court and that motivates the reduced application of this order in the action of protection. The foregoing, because in the case of the protection of fundamental rights, the Sentence for abstract payment for damages extends its scope of protection, to the point of becoming the most powerful order of the judge of constitutional guardianship.

AB - The wide scope of the action of protection decisions in Colombia has allowed in innumerable cases, and not only in the text of sentence, the realization of rights in the lives of people, by granting diverse benefits, whether individuals or those who have administrative function. Amongst this typology of orders, we have Sentences for abstract payment for damages, which, although it is enshrined in the statutory decree that regulates this subject, has been little used by the judges and the Constitutional Court. In this respect and in the case of a typology with economic consequences for the defendant, and taking into account the Colombian context where there is a systematic threat and violation of fundamental rights, this research seeks to establish the sub-rules discovered from the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court and that motivates the reduced application of this order in the action of protection. The foregoing, because in the case of the protection of fundamental rights, the Sentence for abstract payment for damages extends its scope of protection, to the point of becoming the most powerful order of the judge of constitutional guardianship.

KW - Abstract payment for damages

KW - Action of protection

KW - Damages

KW - Jurisprudential line

KW - Reparation

KW - Requirements

KW - Subrules

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057253670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18601/01229893.n42.12

DO - 10.18601/01229893.n42.12

M3 - Artículo

SP - 339

EP - 370

JO - Revista Derecho del Estado

JF - Revista Derecho del Estado

SN - 0122-9893

IS - 42

ER -